Metafictional Eponymousness

Comments

i think at least one auster novel, probably part of the new york trilogy, might qualify?
Not in my recollection, at least. Auster is in City of Glass, but the book itself is not.

Kertesz's Liquidation, I think, does qualify.
Nope. Wrong again! Liquidation is not explicitly named.
The Book of the New Sun, although maybe that's an edge case?
I think I'd accept BOTNS. Christopher Priest's The Affirmation comes pretty close too. The name is not given, but the text of the novel itself is the text of the book the character writes over the course of the book.
Is there something I'm missing that disqualifies If on a winter's night a traveler?
Hm, I guess not. Maybe the criterion was more along the lines of "contains a book of the same title, distinct from the book itself," which would disqualify all our ideas.
the new pynchon has characters who read books containing the boy-adventurer characters, the titles of whose adventures are supplied by the narrator during their sections. but as far as i know, none who are reading the pynchon book.
Pale Fire? The rules are doing my head in :(
i feel like galatea 2.0 has this, though i don't own it to check. there's definitely a writer called richard powers in the book....

Metafictional references in fiction: in which a character in a novel is reading or writing a book of the same name as that in which he or she features

If you take this at face value as long as the book-in-the-book has the same title as the book itself, it counts. So the definition is fairly broad.

House of Leaves is another one.

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

waggish

About Me

waggish
United States
You talk too loud when you're out in the crowd.

Neighborhood

Explore friends, family, friends & family, or entire neighborhood.

Archives